Conflict on Terror — International Points

on

|

views

and

comments


Creator and Web page info

  • by Anup Shah
  • This web page final up to date

It was with disbelief and shock that folks all over the world noticed footage of the terrorist assaults within the US on on September 11, 2001 when the planes-turned-missiles slammed into the World Commerce Middle towers and broken the Pentagon.

This in the end resulted within the US declaring and waging a conflict on terror. Osama Bin Laden was finally tracked down and killed some 10 years later. However the way in which the conflict on terror has been performed has led to many voicing issues concerning the affect on civil liberties, the price of the extra safety centered modifications, the implications of the invasions and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and extra.

Response to the September 11, 2001 occasions

With disbelief and shock all over the world individuals noticed the information footage of the occasions on September 11, 2001 when the planes-turned-missiles slammed into the World Commerce Middle towers and into the Pentagon. What might be the worst terrorist assault on the US, was completely inexcusable and roundly condemned.

Some 3000 had been killed. Preliminary fears had been that it was over 6000 A lot of elements for this revised quantity, had been mentioned to incorporate preliminary overestimates; multiple individual reporting the identical lacking individual; heroic rescue operations, and many others. This decrease quantity doesn’t in any approach scale back the affect although.)

The next bombing of Afghanistan to assault Osama Bin Laden’s Al Qaeda terrorist community and the Taliban for harboring them has additionally led to some 3,500 civilian deaths, in accordance with an impartial research launched at the start of December 2001.

The ghastly terrorist assaults led to a mix of political, social and financial response all over the world.

Hatred and anti-Islam sentiment, (with out distinguishing the despotic militants from extraordinary Muslims) elevated, although many of the Muslim communities all over the world condemned this act.

Whereas seen efforts had been seen by politicians to attempt to separate terrorists from Muslims on the whole, it has not been straightforward. On the one hand, after years of financial and geopolitical historical past, there are some features of mistrust, whereas however, extremists within the Muslim and Christian communities are including to the antagonisms. For instance, through the peak of the shock and anger to the September 11 assaults, extremist tendencies within the West resulted in beatings and even killings of Muslims. Even non-Muslims that simply occurred to have lengthy beards or ultimately resembled Taliban/Al Qaeda members had been focused. Others noticed this as proof that Islam is inherently violent or that it’s the main menace to the remainder of the world, and many others. On the Muslim aspect, there have additionally been equally excessive reactions, from assist of those terrorist acts to even being satisfied that this was some type of Zionist conspiracy responsible Muslims! In each instances these appear to be a minority of individuals with such excessive views however in fact the priority is all the time that it’ll enhance over time.

There was no query that there was going to be some type of retaliation and response from the US. One couldn’t have anticipated them severely to chorus from eager to take revenge. But the worry was in what kind this revenge could be and the way it might be carried out in addition to what the affect on extraordinary Afghans could be, who’ve already suffered by the hands of the Taliban and out of doors forces for years.

As well as, some eight months after the assaults it was revealed within the mainstream press all over the world that the CIA had warned George Bush of the threats weeks earlier than September 11. This prompted an uproar in lots of locations, together with the US Congress, the place members demanded extra info to grasp if all these deaths may have been prevented.

Again to prime

Ensuing Conflict on Terror

The horrible occasions of September 11 noticed the appreciable quieting of what was till then rising home and worldwide criticism of the Bush Administration. The September 11 occasions resulted in a conflict on terror which noticed assist for Bush and his recognition soar on the time.

As much as September 11, 2001, the Bush administration was being criticized all over the world for its stances on numerous points domestically and internationally. Even European and different allies had been very important of positions on quite a few world points.

However even earlier than the Bush Administration, all through the world, many countries and teams of individuals had expressed their frustrations at how U.S. international insurance policies had affected them on all types of points, starting from financial/globalization points which have deepened poverty and/or inequality for most individuals all over the world; geopolitics/arms/missile protection; environmental points and so forth. Protests both straight, or not directly at U.S. insurance policies have occurred all all over the world—particularly on globalization points—as talked about on this website online. (See the part on world protests for extra on that, for instance).

But that can’t be an excuse for the atrocity of September 11 because it killed many harmless individuals. On the identical time, individuals have accurately identified that when different areas all over the world have confronted related terrorist assaults, the outpouring of concern and condemnation has not been as a lot. The Washington Put up (September 12, 2001) even dared to confess this at such a delicate time shortly after the assaults. (Their article is now not on-line.)

Nonetheless, behind the unity of the American individuals within the shock of September 11, a heightened sense of safety resulted with issues reverberating all through the world. Many had been involved concerning the ensuing crackdown of freedoms and civil liberties in numerous nations. Many frightened that numerous nations all over the world would additionally use this conflict on terror as an excuse to pursue extra aggressive choices on their very own residents.

For instance, think about the issues Amnesty Worldwide raised in October 2001, shortly after the September 11, 2001 assaults: Within the identify of combating worldwide terrorism, governments have rushed to introduce draconian new measures that threaten the human rights of their very own residents, immigrants and refugees…. Governments have a duty to make sure the protection of their residents, however measures taken should not undermine basic human rights requirements. It seems that among the initiatives at the moment being mentioned or carried out could also be used to curb fundamental human rights and to suppress inside opposition. Among the definitions of terrorism below dialogue are so broad that they may very well be used to criminalize anybody out of favor with these in energy and criminalize respectable peaceable train of the fitting to freedom of expression and affiliation. They may additionally put in danger the fitting to privateness and threaten the rights of minorities and asylum-seekers.

In Might 2003, Amnesty Worldwide charged, The conflict on terror, removed from making the world a safer place, has made it extra harmful by curbing human rights, undermining the rule of worldwide regulation and shielding governments from scrutiny. It has deepened divisions amongst individuals of various faiths and origins, sowing the seeds for extra battle. The overwhelming affect of all that is real worry—among the many prosperous in addition to the poor.

Even within the U.S. among the ensuing insurance policies on how suspects will likely be handled, on how entry to non-public info will likely be made obtainable for safety issues and so forth, led to debates in any respect ranges on what is taken into account an assault on civil liberties, and what’s affordable for safety. On the international coverage area, there was growing concern that the U.S. would be capable of use the conflict on terror to pursue aggressive insurance policies that had been beforehand criticized by many different individuals. This could vary from financial, to political and even army insurance policies. The Iraq conflict was one such instance, the place amongst different issues, the priority of terrorism was used to justify a conflict towards Iraq, although the terrorism hyperlinks weren’t actual.

Additionally of significance, with its unfastened definition of terror, there’s concern that the conflict on terror , may even have an effect on all these working actually for peace and social justice for all, as even they’ll come below scrutiny for maybe appropriately criticizing insurance policies of any variety of nations and organizations all over the world, together with these from the West.

The conflict on terror has in some respects, led to what has been described as a conflict on freedom.

Again to prime

Mainstream Media

Whereas residents all over the place, particularly People, had been rightly outraged on the assaults, the mainstream media has largely focused on the consequences, the assorted aftermaths and impacts, and reporting what political leaders are doing, saying or not doing, or not saying, and many others. They’ve additionally reported immense element on among the features of the particular bombing in Afghanistan, and many others. As with most different conflicts in latest historical past although, whereas huge in amount, media reporting seems comparatively missing in depth, historic context, and investigative evaluation on the causes that gasoline such outrageous militant extremism and terrorism.

The so-called vary of discourse then, is kind of slender, however inside it, protection is kind of detailed. The reporting of some features is certainly very shifting and superb. There may be, nonetheless, acceptable criticism of some extremism creeping into some features of the mainstream media as properly, in sure circumstances. Importantly although, our vary of views can be affected by the vary of discourse. That is particularly related now, as residents search solutions on how and why such a horrible atrocity may very well be dedicated. (For extra on the protection of the media, with evaluation and critique of the mainstream media itself, see this website online’s part: Conflict on Terror Mainstream Media and Propaganda)

Again to prime

Will violence result in extra violence?

With all of the vivid imagery, we are able to solely now start to think about how different individuals and societies all over the world have suffered in different conditions. With usually worse outcomes, albeit not so sudden and stunning, whole cities/areas have been leveled and/or huge quantity of life has been misplaced in locations like Kosovo, Iraq, Democratic Republic of Congo, East Timor, Hiroshima/Nagasaki, throughout Europe through the World Wars, and too many different locations to have the ability to record right here.

With the US-led bombing marketing campaign on Afghanistan, there has all the time been an increasing number of concern about civilians being caught within the center. Certainly, by early December 2001, some 3,500 Afghan civilians had been believed to have been killed by U.S. bombing. Moreover, many assist companies criticized the meals drops for not delivering a lot precise assist and being a token gesture, moderately than an efficient one.

Maybe one of many greatest fears, voiced earlier than the retaliation began, is that retaliated violence may end in extra retaliated violence and we danger tit-for-tat violence that appears laborious to get out of. In all this, civilians on all sides will all the time be affected. We solely want remind ourselves of that shuddering speech by Osama Bin Laden on his threats of retaliation towards civilians and of assorted hawkish politicians within the West asking for the equal of no mercy. Martin Luther King is price quoting:

The last word weak point of violence is that it’s a descending spiral, begetting the very factor it seeks to destroy. As an alternative of diminishing evil, it multiplies it… Via violence chances are you’ll homicide the hater, however you don’t homicide hate. The truth is, violence merely will increase hate…. Returning violence for violence multiplies violence, including deeper darkness to an evening already devoid of stars. Darkness can’t drive out darkness; solely mild can try this. Hate can’t drive out hate; Solely love can try this.

Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

But, how does one get out of this vicious circle? In fact it isn’t straightforward, and even lots of the peace motion wrestle on this reply, however maybe if extra voice was given within the media to those broader views, then various ideas may very well be thought-about. True, extra on peace-related options are mentioned in TV boards and debates, however relating to the precise reporting and one-on-one dialogue and evaluation, the context is proscribed to the present actions and choices. The discussions are subsequently inside these confines, principally.

On the international coverage entrance, even latest historical past of the final 50 years or so has been questionable by each Western leaders and Center Japanese leaders. For instance, the assist by the west of brutal leaders within the center east has contributed to an extremist backlash. Of their struggle to get the Soviet Union out of Afghanistan, Osama Bin Laden himself, in addition to different jihadists, had been supported by the US, encouraging the coaching of jihadists and the rise of miltantism to impress opposition to the communists. Because the article within the earlier hyperlink implies, whereas evidently the lesser of two evils was supported, maybe the long run penalties weren’t absolutely explored and it does appear that violence and worry breeds extra violence and worry.

Again to prime

President Bush dropping the conflict on terror

Again to prime

On quite a few fronts there are various, many issues occurring which readers have requested me to put in writing on. It’s tough to maintain up with all of the angles with the view to put in writing on all of them. In consequence, for now, till I’m able to catch up, included beneath, below this part on the conflict on terrorism are articles reposted from different web pages and authors from all over the world that provide a wide range of deeper and wider views and views. They’re broadly categorized into the sections listed beneath, though many articles can simply match different classes too.

Additionally, within the Extra Info web page is a rising assortment of hyperlinks and sources to different web pages that provide deeper views.

I don’t essentially agree with all the views of all of the hyperlinks and sources offered, and not at all are they a complete record, moderately an instance.

Among the extra mainstream sources focus far more on the consequences and aftermaths, whereas among the different sources additionally supply deeper evaluation on causes in addition to ramifications all over the world. These websites have extra hyperlinks that you could comply with to different web pages. Extra websites will likely be added as time goes on.

Again to prime

13 articles on “Conflict on Terror”: